PIC32MZ vs. STM32F4 - Which Microcontroller Has Better Audio Capabilities

September 27, 2021

Introduction

When it comes to audio processing in embedded systems, the choice of microcontroller can make a significant difference. In this comparison, we take a look at the PIC32MZ and STM32F4 microcontrollers to see which provides better audio capabilities.

PIC32MZ

The PIC32MZ is a high-performance microcontroller manufactured by Microchip Technology. It is based on a MIPS32 processor core and has a clock speed of up to 200 MHz. The PIC32MZ has up to 2 MB of Flash memory, 512 KB of RAM, and a floating-point unit (FPU).

Audio Capabilities

The PIC32MZ has an advanced audio codec with features such as 192 kHz playback, 24-bit resolution, and 106 dB dynamic range. It also has a dedicated audio PLL for improved clock accuracy and an I2S interface for interfacing with audio devices. Furthermore, the PIC32MZ has a built-in DMA controller that allows for efficient audio data transfer between the codec and memory.

STM32F4

The STM32F4 is a popular microcontroller manufactured by STMicroelectronics. It is based on the ARM Cortex-M4 processor core and has a clock speed of up to 168 MHz. The STM32F4 has up to 1 MB of Flash memory, 192 KB of RAM, and a floating-point unit (FPU).

Audio Capabilities

The STM32F4 also has an advanced audio codec with features such as 192 kHz playback and 24-bit resolution. It has a dynamic range of up to 99 dB and supports various audio interfaces such as I2S, S/PDIF, and USB audio class. Additionally, the STM32F4 has a built-in DMA controller for efficient audio data transfer.

Comparison

Both microcontrollers have impressive audio capabilities and are suitable for audio processing applications. However, the PIC32MZ has a higher dynamic range of 106 dB compared to the STM32F4's 99 dB. Additionally, the PIC32MZ has a more accurate audio PLL, which can help in achieving high-quality audio playback.

On the other hand, the STM32F4 supports a wider range of audio interfaces and has a maximum clock speed of 168 MHz, higher than the PIC32MZ's 200 MHz.

Conclusion

The choice between the PIC32MZ and STM32F4 microcontrollers depends on various factors such as the specific audio application and system requirements. Both microcontrollers have strong audio capabilities, but the PIC32MZ might be better suited for applications that require high dynamic range and accurate clocking. Meanwhile, the STM32F4 might be a better choice for applications that require a wider range of audio interfaces and higher processing power.

References

  1. Microchip Technology Inc. "PIC32MZ Embedded Connector Interface (ECI) Audio." Microchip Technology Inc, 2021, https://www.microchip.com/wwwproducts/en/PIC32MZ0512EFE064.

  2. STMicroelectronics. "High-performance STM32F4 microcontrollers." STMicroelectronics, 2021, https://www.st.com/en/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32f4-series.html.


© 2023 Flare Compare